Russia In Secret Anti-Fracking Plot With Greenpeace, Warns Nato Boss


Russian secret agents have infiltrated Greenpeace and other campaign groups to co-ordinate the war against fracking, it has been alleged.

After Russia unceremoniously locked 30 Greenpeace activists in jail after a protest at a Gazprom oil rig, it may seem unlikely that Putin and the environmentalists would ever find common ground. But according to the secretary-general of Nato, they have – fracking.

The Kremlin’s distaste for shale gas fracking is not down to a keenly-felt concern for its environmental impact. It is pure economics, born from a desire to keep Europe dependent on gas imports from Moscow.

fracking

Protestors during an Anti-Fracking demonstration outside the Jumeirah Carlton Tower hotel in Knightsbridge 

Speaking at Chatham House, Nato’s Anders Fogh Rasmussen said: “I have met allies who can report that Russia, as part of their sophisticated information and disinformation operations, engaged actively with so-called non-governmental organisations — environmental organisations working against shale gas — to maintain European dependence on imported Russian gas.”

He did not elaborate on whether the infiltration was undercover, or whether the groups were actively collaborating with the Russian interests. “That is my interpretation,” he said.

A spokesman for Greenpeace said: “The idea we’re puppets of Putin is so preposterous that you have to wonder what they’re smoking over at NATO HQ. Mr Rasmussen should spend less time dreaming up conspiracy theories and more time on the facts.”

Andrew Pendleton, the head of campaigns at Friends of the Earth, added: “Perhaps the Russians are worried about our huge wind and solar potential, and have infiltrated the UK government.”

anders fogh rasmussen

NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen has said Russia is infiltrating anti-fracking groups 

Alyona Aslanov, a campaigner for Frack Off, said: “The UK anti-fracking movement is almost exclusively made up of grassroots community groups organising against these developments where they live. Beyond Lush [the cosmetics shop], we receive no funding from any corporate donors and have a policy of not taking money from anyone who may want to influence our campaigning efforts.”

Rasmussen said that a diverse source of energy would lead to “the better functioning of the European energy market so that one single supplier is not able to blackmail one single nation,” a coded reference to the threats from Russia to cut off gas supplies to the Ukraine during the turmoil of the Maidan protests and its aftermath.

arctic 30

Greenpeace International activists embrace each other after hearing the Russian parliament passed an amnesty  

Gazprom, which is state-owned and the world’s biggest gas producer, says fracking has “significant environmental risks” including water contamination, concerns shared by activists.

(for the whole article see The Huffington Post, 20 June 2014)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: